LibreOffice Asia Conf 2025 – Panel: Lessons from Open Source Business, Part I

LibreOffice Asia Conference logo

Frankin Weng writes:

The annual community event LibreOffice Asia Conference was held on December 13-14 2025 in Tokyo, Japan. One of the sessions was a panel discussion titled “Lessons from Open Source Business,” moderated by me, featuring three company leaders from different countries sharing how they run their businesses with open source tools. This article covers the first part of the panel: the business introductions.

(Note: photo credits: Tetsuji Koyama, CC BY 4.0)

Business Introductions

Germany: Lothar Becker and .riess applications

Lothar Becker

The first to present was Lothar Becker from Germany, Managing Director and owner of “.riess applications.” The company primarily operates in Europe, providing consulting services based on open source solutions.

Lothar described himself as not being development-oriented, but rather focused on client relationships and consulting — a personal trait that has shaped the company’s direction. As a consulting firm, a defining feature of .riess’s business model is that it does not charge for technical support or long-term support licensing fees. Instead, they productize their expertise as consulting services. This means .riess operates on a people- and time-based revenue model, which does not lend itself to the kind of exponential revenue scaling that SaaS companies achieve through near-zero marginal costs.

Regarding market positioning, Lothar noted that .riess has extensive experience in desktop-oriented open source solutions. “This was the direction we set 20 years ago. At the time, every company in Europe was focused on the server side and the operating system side, while very few were working on the desktop. By not following the crowd, we carved our own path. It wasn’t easy, but it turned out to be the right decision,” Lothar said.

.riess has served many notable clients, including internationally renowned companies such as JP Morgan Chase and the Deutsche Bundesbank. They have also been involved in large-scale government migration projects, including those in Schleswig-Holstein and the Free State of Thuringia (Freistaat Thüringen). In the Schleswig-Holstein case, 25,000 client endpoints were migrated from Microsoft Office to LibreOffice. The project established a resilient support structure: the government’s existing IT service provider, Dataport, handled first- and second-level support, while .riess provided third-level support focusing on strategic consulting, macro migration, and interoperability issues.

Development and bug fixing were handled by another open source partner, Allotropia. This collaborative model demonstrates how small open source service companies can participate in large government migration projects by partnering with others, each contributing their specific expertise. Beyond major clients, .riess has also helped many smaller clients adopt online collaborative office suites and other open source solutions.

Taiwan: Kevin Lin and OSSII

Kevin Lin

The next speaker was Kevin Lin from OSSII (Open Source Software Integral Institute) in Taiwan. Founded in 2003, OSSII’s core business includes LibreOffice-related product development and system integration, Nextcloud customization and deployment, and open source solution consulting services. Kevin noted that his core role is to serve as a bridge between the government, enterprises, and the open source community, while helping clients stay grounded and avoid unrealistic expectations: open source is powerful, but making effective use of it still requires proper planning and professional support.

OSSII is focused on localized office productivity solutions built on open source software. On the desktop side, “OxOffice” is a LibreOffice-based office suite customized with various features tailored to the needs of Taiwanese enterprises and government agencies.

For online collaboration, “OxOffice Online” is an online editor derived from Collabora Online. Together with “ODFWeb”, an online collaboration platform customized from Nextcloud that provides full-text search, data sharing, and file permission management, these components form a complete open source document collaboration ecosystem. Kevin also demonstrated real-world customer deployments, proving that the solution works reliably in large-scale environments.

It’s worth noting that OSSII has maintained a close partnership with the Taiwanese government for over a decade. After the government established policies to promote the Open Document Format (ODF) standard, the open source community helped with advocacy while OSSII provided technical solutions centered on LibreOffice, contributing as much source code as possible back to the community. Kevin showed the Ministry of Digital Affairs’ “ODF Application Tools” page, with its source code publicly shared on GitHub — a prime example of collaboration between government, enterprise, and the open source community.

Finally, Kevin reiterated his company’s role as a bridge: OSSII connects communities and open source projects on one side with enterprises, government, and end users on the other, facilitating exchange and interaction through operations, development, integration, and training. OSSII’s vision is to open up Taiwan’s traditionally closed software ecosystem, reduce dependence on major vendors, and support digital sovereignty while maintaining a healthy business environment.

Indonesia: Ahmad Haris and STIA & Nenggala

Ahmad Haris

The third speaker was Ahmad Haris from Indonesia, who serves as Vice President at STIA and founder of Nenggala. Rather than talking about a vision and mission statements, he preferred to let his case studies speak for themselves.

Haris joked that government officials sometimes refer to him as a “technology magician” because they always come to him with all sorts of challenges—often with deadlines of just three to four weeks. The largest government project he handled at STIA was building a biometric-based criminal record database for the Indonesian Attorney General’s Office, capable of connecting to cameras and surveillance systems, enabling real-time facial recognition matching against criminal records. This system is expected to be deployed to every city in Indonesia within the next few years.

What stands out is that Haris has never successfully “sold” LibreOffice as a standalone offering. Instead, his approach is to embed LibreOffice within backend systems to handle document generation – so users don’t even know they’re using LibreOffice. He even plans to try getting clients to use Linux on the desktop next: not by pushing it, but by building it first, showing that it works well, and then saying, “It’s up to you whether you want to use it.”

Nenggala has only three full-time employees including Haris himself, yet they have built an impressive array of tools: a secure communication system based on the Matrix protocol, used by the election commission during the last presidential election and serving over 300,000 users; task management based on Planka; and SymbiotOS, a hardened mobile device solution based on GrapheneOS with high privacy and security standards — even capable of running Debian on a phone via KVM.

However, not every project is profitable. During the COVID-19 pandemic, they built a remote learning solution using BigBlueButton and Moodle, but rural elementary schools simply couldn’t afford to pay. Haris just couldn’t bring himself to charge them, and in some cases even donated servers.

Haris also shared an important practice: when his team uses open source projects, they don’t simply fork and rebrand—they actively contribute back upstream. For example, when they adopted the support management system Zammad, they discovered that an Indonesian language translation was missing. His teammate Rania Amina completed the full localization and pushed it upstream. Rania has since become the Indonesian language maintainer for the project.

Moderator’s Summary

After the three business introductions, Franklin provided a comparative summary of the three speakers’ business styles:

  • Kevin’s OSSII started in the OpenOffice.org era and has remained focused on LibreOffice and Nextcloud. They have their own products, development capabilities, and do customization—a well-rounded, all-in-one type.
  • Lothar’s .riess applications traces its origins back even further, having been the first commercial service partner for StarOffice and later OpenOffice.org. Today, they have chosen to focus purely on services: no products, no licensing fees, no development — a highly focused consulting model.
  • Haris leverages open source technologies across different business models. His two companies differ in approach: STIA is project-oriented, while Nenggala is more product-oriented. Both do development and customization, but with different emphases.

Despite their different paths, Franklin pointed out several clear commonalities. First, all three started by participating in open source communities and gradually developed their skills in development, community leadership, or business operations along the way. Second, scaling remains a challenge for these companies; none of them has more than ten employees. Being small companies, they always need to collaborate with other partners, operating in a “fight as a group” mode. Finally, all three have extensive experience working with government clients, helping public sector organizations migrate to and adopt open source solutions.

Welcome Vissarion Fisikopoulos, new LibreOffice developer focusing on Base

Photo of Vissarion

LibreOffice Base is the database component of the suite, and hasn’t seen a lot of development activity in recent years. So The Document Foundation – the non-profit behind the software – wants to change that! Following Neil Roberts, we now have a second new developer, Vissarion Fisikopoulos, so let’s hear from him…

Tell us a bit about yourself!

Hi everyone, I’m Vissarion, a software engineer and researcher based in Athens, Greece, and I’m very happy to have joined The Document Foundation to work on LibreOffice Base. My background combines scientific computing, databases, and open-source development, and I’ve been a long term contributor to several open source projects like MySQL, Boost C++ libraries and GeomScale. I am active in open source communities, and I speak regularly about open source development at conferences such as FOSDEM.

What’s your new role at TDF, and what will you be working on?

My new role at TDF is to work on LibreOffice Base and databases more broadly, with a focus on Base itself and the ways database functionality connects with the rest of LibreOffice.
In practice, that means working mostly in C++, fixing bugs, improving code quality, and helping implement features across Base’s frontend and backend.

How can all users of LibreOffice help you in this work?

Users can help a lot in this work!

Clear bug reports, reproducible test cases, feedback on real-world Base workflows, and testing development versions are all extremely valuable, because they help turn vague problems into issues that can actually be fixed.

And beyond that, contributions through QA, documentation, translations, and newcomer-friendly developer tasks all help strengthen the project as a whole.

So if you use LibreOffice Base, or if you care about databases and open source office software in general, your feedback and participation can genuinely help to shape the work ahead.

Thanks Vissarion – we’re looking forward to your work!

The Foundation Is Strong: What TDF Is, Why It Matters, and Where It Is Going

The Document Foundation was created in 2010 with a single, non-negotiable premise: that a free, fully-featured office suite, built on open standards and governed in the public interest, is infrastructure for democracy. Not a product. Not a market position. Infrastructure, the kind that belongs to everyone and can be taken from no one.

Sixteen years later, that premise is under pressure. And it is worth stating clearly, on the record, what TDF is, what it has done, what it is doing, and why the decisions it has made – including the difficult ones – follow directly from the founding commitment rather than betraying it.

What a Foundation Is For

Our foundation, like many others, exists to hold something in trust. Not for its current contributors, not for its most prolific developers and not for the companies that build products on top of its work, but for the public, across time. That is not a bureaucratic abstraction. It is a legal and ethical obligation that governs every decision the Board of Directors makes.

In Germany, where TDF is registered, such obligations are enforced by law. A gemeinnützige Stiftung – a foundation with charitable status – operates under strict rules designed to prevent any private interest from capturing a public asset. When those rules are tested, the foundation has no discretion: it must act to protect its status, its assets, and its mission, or it ceases to exist in any meaningful sense.

This is the context in which recent governance decisions must be understood. Not as a power struggle and not as the revenge of administrators against engineers, but as the fulfillment of a legal and institutional duty that TDF’s founders accepted when they chose this structure in 2010.

What Actually Happened

Over several years, independent lawyers identified two main areas in which decisions made by board members associated to ecosystem companies created conflicts of interest serious enough to endanger TDF’s charitable status.

These were not hypothetical risks or bureaucratic hair-splitting. They were documented, in writing, by multiple qualified professionals with no stake in the outcome.

Attempts to address these problems through internal policy reform began as early as 2021. A conflict-of-interest policy was introduced. However, the version that was ultimately approved was weaker than what TDF’s legal advisors had recommended. The stronger version was not approved by a board that included representatives of the companies whose conduct was in question. Unfortunately, the milder version proved insufficient.

By 2023 and 2024, the problems were confirmed in successive audit cycles. The Board’s current composition – which no longer includes employees of ecosystem companies – then proceeded to adopt governance reforms, as a change of behavior was urged for repeatedly by lawyers. Amongst the changes introduced, a bylaw provision that suspends membership for individuals whose employers are involved in legal proceedings that directly threaten the foundation’s existence.

The scope of this provision is narrow and specific: it does not apply to ordinary commercial disputes, but only to situations in which the foundation’s charitable status, assets or legal standing are at risk.

The suspension of membership for more than thirty individuals employed by one ecosystem partner followed the activation of this provision, but was announced in detail by two different messages which were clearly outlining the consequences for TDF Members.

The individuals remain welcome in the LibreOffice community. They retain their roles in the Engineering Steering Committee and other technical bodies. They are invited to TDF events. The suspension applies to formal TDF membership and the governance rights that come with it, for the entire duration of the legal consultation process.

This is not a purge. It is a governance safeguard doing exactly what governance safeguards are designed to do.

What TDF Is Building

It would be a mistake to read the current moment as purely defensive. While managing a governance crisis that it did not choose, TDF has continued to invest in the software and the community that give the foundation its purpose.

In the past twelve months, TDF’s eight staff developers contributed 4,077 patches to LibreOffice. Two additional developers have recently joined TDF staff, with one specifically assigned to LibreOffice Base, a module that has been under-resourced for years. Also, work is underway on deeper code modernization: architectural improvements that have accumulated for decades and that require sustained, focused effort rather than feature-driven patch contributions. Announcements on this work are forthcoming.

TDF is also actively developing its thinking on LibreOffice Online. The community has expressed clear interest in a genuinely community-governed online editing capability, distinct from the commercially driven fork that currently occupies that space. This is early-stage work, responsive to community demand, and it will proceed on the community’s terms.

On the standards and policy front, TDF continues its advocacy for ODF as the native document format for public administration software procurement. The Deutschland-Stack mandate, Brazil’s Lei 15.211/2025, and the ongoing digital sovereignty conversation in EU institutions all represent vindication of positions TDF has held and argued for years. This work – unglamorous, slow, and essential – is what a foundation does that a company cannot.

The Question of Meritocracy

The argument has been made, loudly and repeatedly in recent weeks, that TDF has betrayed the meritocratic principles on which LibreOffice was founded, that by limiting the governance role of the most prolific code contributors, the foundation has handed control to people who do not deserve it.

This argument deserves a serious answer rather than dismissal. Meritocracy, as a governance principle, requires that merit be defined in terms of the goals of the organization.

In a commercial software company, lines of code and commit counts might be reasonable proxies for value. In a public-interest foundation whose mission is to protect free software as a commons, merit includes legal compliance, community stewardship, standards advocacy, documentation, translation, user support, and long-term protection of the assets against capture by any single interest, including the most technically capable one.

The original sin of the meritocracy argument as applied here is the assumption that writing code confers the right to govern a foundation. It does not – any more than being the largest donor confers the right to direct a charity’s strategy, or being the most productive employee confers the right to override a board’s fiduciary decisions. These are different roles, each one with a different accountability, and conflating them is not a defense of meritocracy, but an argument for capture.

TDF values its developer community without reservation. It is investing in growing that community, both inside the foundation and across the broader ecosystem. But a foundation even partially governed by the people associated with its largest commercial contributor is not a foundation but a subsidiary.

The Road Ahead

LibreOffice is healthy. Its codebase is actively maintained, its release cadence is regular, its user base is growing in the sectors – public administration, education, and civic infrastructure – where free software matters most. The governance difficulties of recent months have been painful and public, but they have not compromised the software.

TDF is not complacent about the challenges ahead. The competitive landscape is more demanding than ever. Microsoft’s AI integration, although problematic under many points of view, raises the stakes for interoperability. The digital sovereignty moment in Europe creates both opportunities and obligations. The foundation’s technical roadmap must match the ambition of its policy positions.

What TDF will not do is resolve these challenges by abandoning the principles that make it worth defending. The foundation holds, not out of stubbornness, but because the alternative is to become something that no longer serves the purpose for which it was built.

Sixteen years ago, a group of sixteen people decided that the world needed office software that belonged to everyone. That decision has not aged at all. It has, if anything, become more important, and TDF exists to honor it.

LibreOffice at Document Freedom Day in Noida, India

LibreOffice at Document Freedom Day in Noida, India

Ravi Dwivedi from the Indian LibreOffice community writes:

On the 29th of March 2026, we celebrated Document Freedom Day in Noida India. Thanks for Essentia.dev for the venue and sflc.in for sponsoring snacks and the cake. sflc.in is a donor-supported legal services organisation in India.

The event featured a few talks on free software such as OpenStreetMap, Prav and KDE, and also a lawyer told us how they manage all their clients’ data with free software and keeping their privacy in mind. In addition, we distributed LibreOffice merch at the sticker table.

Participants also played a fun game of guessing free software. Finally, the Document Freedom Day cake was cut followed by a group photo.

We thank all the participants and speakers who made the event possible.

LibreOffice at Document Freedom Day in Noida, India

LibreOffice at Document Freedom Day in Noida, India

LibreOffice at Document Freedom Day in Noida, India

LibreOffice at Document Freedom Day in Noida, India

LibreOffice at the Chemnitzer Linux-Tage 2026

Linux-Tage banner

The Chemnitzer Linux-Tage (English page) is a yearly event in Germany for fans of free and open source software. This year, the LibreOffice project was present, as Karl-Heinz Gruner describes:

LibreOffice had an information booth at the event. Stickers and flyers were very popular. An excerpt from their extensive video tutorials was shown, including a summary of the new features in the current version.

Many questions were answered and tips were provided across all components. Enthusiastic feedback demonstrated the broad user community. Suggestions for contributing and expanding the community, such as user documentation, should attract new members over time and strengthen the active community.

We plan to be at many more events this year, including the Augsburger Linux-Infotag 2026 in early May, so see you there – and keep an eye on this blog!