Sign the open letter about the universal right to install any software on any device
Earlier in 2022, together with more than 100 European organisations and companies, The Document Foundation has signed the #OpenLetter about the universal right to install any software on any device. Join us and sign the letter today.
To: Legislators in the European Union
In copy: Citizens of the European Union
The universal right to freely choose operating systems, software and services
Software design is crucial for the ecodesign and sustainability of products and hardware. Free Software systems and services enable reuse, repurposing and interoperability of devices. The universal right to freely choose operating systems, software and services is crucial for a more sustainable digital society.
The ongoing digitization of infrastructures and services comes along with a continuously growing number of electronic devices that are connected to the Internet – be it in private, public or business environments. Many of these devices need more energy and natural resources to be produced than the energy they consume during their entire lifespan. And way too many of these devices are being wasted and not reparable simply because the software stops working or is not being updated anymore.
Once the pre-installed software stops users from continuing to use their hardware, restrictive ownership models prevent users from helping themselves to enjoy longer use of their devices. Restrictions span from physically locking down hardware, to technical obscurity by using proprietary software, to legal restrictions via software licenses and end user license agreements. This way, manufacturers often prohibit repairability, access and reuse of their devices. Even after purchase, customers often do not really own their devices. They are not able to do what they want with their very own devices. If you cannot install the software you want on your own device – you don’t own it.
We, the signees of this open letter,
- recognize that free access to the hardware and software determines how long or how often a device can be used or reused.
- declare the increased longevity and reusability of our devices to be inevitable for a more sustainable digital society.
That is why we ask legislators around Europe to make use of the historic chance and enable a more sustainable use of electronic products and devices with a universal right to install and run any software on any device. To this end, we demand that:
Users have the right to freely choose operating systems and software running on their devices
Our tablets, phones and other connected devices are general purpose computers. Replacing software and operating systems on these devices enables us to extend the initial lifespan of a device and to make full use of our hardware. For the ability to reuse and repurpose our resources in a creative and sustainable way we need the universal right to install and develop any operating system and software we want on any of our devices. Any legal, technical or other obstacles to reuse these devices for any purpose must not be allowed.
Users have the right to freely choose between service providers to connect their devices with
Users must have the free choice of providers offering software related services, meaning they can use the device from one manufacturer with the service provided by another. Many connected clients today go to waste simply because their online services go offline. Free choice of services allows these clients to be reused by connecting to another service.
Operating systems and embedded software determine possible interactions between generic sensors, modules and systems with their connected online services. For users to exercise free choice of services, they must be able to use the device from one manufacturer with any online service, which could be supplied by any other third party or by themselves. Connected services as well as the software on connected devices and applications must offer interoperability and full functionality of a device’s initial purpose with the use of Open Standards.
Devices are interoperable and compatible with open standards
Software designs and architectures determine accessibility and compatibility of hardware via standards, drivers, tools, and interfaces. Proprietary software and protocols hinder competition among manufacturers, undermine repairability of devices and create an artificial incompatibility of different devices within the same infrastructure. Interoperability of single devices however is crucial for the creation of sufficient, sustainable and long-lasting IT infrastructures. To enable interoperability, manufacturers must ensure that any data necessary to run a device’s primary function is compatible with and possible to import/export in open standards.
Source code of drivers, tools, and interfaces are published under a free license
Smaller components of a device often require specific drivers, tools, and interfaces to operate. Users need full access and free reusability of the source code of those drivers, tools, and interfaces to analyse and integrate a device within a set of interconnected devices from different manufacturers. Source code reusability is also key to exercise the full right to repair for any third-parties from professional repair shops to repair cafés to end users.
A free license is any license that gives everyone the four freedoms to use, study, share and improve the software, including Free Software and Open Source Software licenses. The obligation to publish drivers, tools, and interfaces under such a free license after market entry is key for full access to our devices and exercising the universal right to repair.
To sign the open letter, you can click on the following link: Open Letter about the universal right to install any software on any device
Freedom is a human right!
There are many different variations of devices and many new ones will become available in the future. It is important that we can access the software on any compatible device we happen to own, as devices fail or become obsolete at an amazing rate. Thus, purchasing software should entitle us to a license to have and use at least one copy of that software on one device at a time.
This is an important right that is deserved by every citizen.
It is absolutely ridiculous that it’s even up for discussion.
I agree
We must reduce e-waste, and planned obscurity to drive new purchases does not benefit us or our environment.
I don’t think you know what you’re typing? Planned obscurity? Really? It’s called planned obsolescence. On top of that, that’s been disproven over and over. It’s not a thing companies actually do.
However, devices NEED to be removed from usage if they have ANY sort of network connectivity capabilities. This isn’t some thing industry manufacturers made up or pushed. This is a fact. Hardware has built-in security vulnerabilities that cannot be patched or fixed simply because of it’s design.
This is something that is important for me. The reason we are able to help so many families is because our only financial cost is our monthly Zoom licence and our alternat-i-ves.org domain name.
All our presentation slides and documents are produced using LibreOffice, our PC is running the Linux Mint operating system (it stopped being compatible with Windows years ago) and our website is a £20 Raspberry Pi connected to our broadband router.
https://www.libreoffice.org
https://www.linuxmint.com
https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/raspberry-pi-3-model-b
Here’s what we do as volunteers, free for anyone on the internet.
https://www.alternat-i-ves.org
This is a load of complete nonsense. It reeks of ignorance and petulance.
About time!
so this mean i am allowed to install ios on galaxy phone or nintendo switch os on xbox series x?
this nonsense is important … in that this discussion is literally nonsense :/
interpretation and interoperability are huge issues for both private companies wishing to compete and private citizens wishing to get the biggest bang for their money. Having worked in IT over 40 years and seeing the success and disaster of various OSes I must say that “staying” in an ecosystem will get both expensive and disappointing more as compatibility declines. Having MacOS stay on Intel rather than PowerPC was a decided choice by Apple and now moving to the M1 was needed to try to stop Hackintoshes … but anyway you try to twist you will not be able to escape the compatibility of death … insecurity will rule Supreme !!! Long Live BeOS!
By saying that we should have a “right” to install any software on any device you are saying that developers would be forced to make their software compatible with every operating system in existence.
That would mean requiring developers to allocate their labor to areas where they would not be compensated enough to warrant their efforts.
This is akin to forced labor, which I’m pretty sure you are against.